DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992 Summary: FOP Compliance page update Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: documentation AssignedTo: email@example.com ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremias, >From fop-dev mailing list: On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 03:03 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 03.08.2005 08:32:07 Manuel Mall wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 04:52 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > On 02.08.2005 03:18:44 Manuel Mall wrote: > > ... > Sounds good. Thanks a lot! "WIP" could be replaced by "Trunk" for > now. Done ... > If you want to start fill in stuff yourself, you could go through all > the testcases in: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengi >ne/testcases/ > > If you want to run these testcases from the command-line, you can use > the testcase2fo.xsl stylesheet in the parent directory of the above. > But it's no problem if you send in your changes now. I guess it will > only take me about an hour to fill in the second column. I've got a > pretty good overview what works and what not. > had a look at the test cases there are just too many for manual processing. I rather "pick" your brain first and if there are any question marks left I would be happy to investigate, write testcases, etc.. I will attach the svn patch file and also a file called skinconf.xsl which is a replacement for the file of the same name in your Forrest main/webapp/skins/pelt/ directory. Note that I am using Forrest 0.7. Happy for you to bounce it back to me after you made your changes to the trunk compliance column. And as said above happy to investigate any items you are unsure about. ... > > I also noticed that a number of objects and properties are marked > > as compliant but in the comment column is a remark indicating there > > is a problem with the compliance. For example: Property > > "border-before-style" is marked as compliant but in the comment it > > says "only "solid" works". Isn't that a partial compliance only? > > Shall I update all those type of entries to "partial"? > > Yes, please, that sounds more reasonable. Done > > Jeremias Maerki Manuel -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.