DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 11:32 ------- Maybe there is a case (although unlikely, I must admit!) which could make significant to have word-spacing="0pt" != word-spacing="normal" Let's suppose I want some text to be justified modifying only the letter spaces, while I desire word-spaces to have all the same width: I would easily set letter-spacing.minimum, .optimum and .maximum as I wish, and word- spacing="0pt". But if word-spacing="0pt" is the same as "normal", to avoid word space adjustment I should set word-spacing.minimum="Xpt", .optimum="0pt" and .maximum="-Y", where X and Y are meant to "undo" the stretch and shrink of a word space (which are application dependent, so I could not know them). To be more clear: I thought that a word space min-opt-max values come from the size of a space character, let's call it W, according to the font; if the property "word-spacing" is explicitly set, then the resulting min-opt-max size is: W + .minimum, W + .optimum, W + .maximum while when word-spacing is "normal" we use some hard-coded, default values, obtaining: W + UA.min, W + UA.opt, W + UA.max But if I don't succeed in convincing you, I won't insist :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
