On 14.08.2005 19:27:57 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Hmm, I wouldn't remove servlet.jar. After all, it's one of the smallest
> > JARs we keep around. But did you realize the servlet is already built in
> > its own Ant target or do I miss your point?
> The WAR file is built separately, compilation of the Java files
> is part of the mass source compile.
> I know that servlet.jar isn't big. It just seems to be out of
> place. After all, Xalan doesn't ship with servlet.jar either.
Well, maybe the Xalan guys simply don't know that there is a
Apache-licensed servlet.jar they can distribute. After all, it's very
hard to find information on that little part.
I think this is simply a service to our users that doesn't cost us much.