As all of the table FOs are direct descendants of FObj this is a reasonable thought. Might really be worthwhile.
On 25.08.2005 21:45:16 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone ever thought about introducing an abstract class for > table-related FOs, say TableFObj, that would be extended by all those > FOs? > > It just occurred to me that there are: > a) the border-precedences that are applicable only to those types of FO > (=all of them) > b) the borders themselves that behave differently when specified on > table-FOs in case of collapse(-with-precedence) > > I just got to thinking that an abstract superclass could be used to > bundle some of that functionality. (For example: binding the > border-*-precedence properties. Right now, the related code has to be > repeated in at least five classes...) > > Although currently I don't see a compelling reason to do so, it might > be an idea that's worth revisiting later on... I'll keep it on my > personal list of ideas to consider, unless anyone has strong objections > against such a move. > > > WDYT? Jeremias Maerki