On Aug 28, 2005, at 16:21, Manuel Mall wrote:

We could either:
- drop the table completely (+ warn about this, of course)
- explicitly notify the user that, because auto-layout is not
supported, the default value of "auto" is ignored and replaced by
I second that for the time being.

Seemed the most sane thing to me as well, so added a few warnings for:

- lack of support of auto-layout (if explicitly specified)
- non-standard fallback when using fixed layout/auto width



Reply via email to