On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:07 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Like others I'm hesitant to call it 1.0 just yet. 0.9 sends the right > signal IMO. We're not quite where we want to be but we are soon and > people can start looking at the new package.
I would recommend calling it 0.90, since obviously 9 < 20 which may confuse packagers and package management systems. -- Peter S. Housel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>