On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:12 pm, Finn Bock wrote: > >><linearea bpd="11100" space-before="1650" space-after="1650"> > >> <inlinearea bpd="9250"> > >> <textarea font-size="10pt">some 10pt text</textarea> > >> <inlinearea bpd="11100"> > >> <textarea font-size="12pt">some 12pt text</textarea> > >> </inlinearea> > >> <textarea font-size="10pt">more 10pt text</textarea> > >> </inlinearea> > >><linearea> > >> > >>All the inline areas also have a line-height trait of 12000 but > >> that is only used when lls="line-height" [4.6]. > > [Manuel] > > > Hmm, the line-height property would be "normal" everywhere which > > equates to "1.2" that means the trait would be "14400" for areas > > generated from fo elements with a font-size of "12pt" and "12000" > > for areas generated from fo elements with a font-size of "10pt". > > But as you said it doesn't matter really unless lss is > > "line-height". > > Your are right, my mistake. I believe the line-height trait should be > 14400 for all the inline areas. >
Why do you say that the line-height trait should be the same for all areas? In the line-height case the specified value (1.2) is inherited not the computed value. Therefore I was assuming that on the areas generated from fo elements with font-size="10pt" the line-height trait would be 12000. > >>Does it make sense? > > > > Yes it does. Does it also means the bpd doesn't "bubble up" in the > > case of nested inlines? So if we expand on the example of the > > nested inline above: > > > > <fo:block><fo:inline font-size=10pt">some 10pt text<fo:inline > > font-size="14pt">some 14 pt text</fo:inline>more 10pt > > text</fo:inline></fo:block> > > > > Does the line-area generated from that have a bpd corresponding to > > a 12pt font or 14 pt font (spec [4.5] for lss="max-height": > > "block-progression-direction is the minimum required to enclose > > both the nominal-requested-line-rectangle and the > > allocation-rectangles of all the inline-areas stacked within the > > line-area")? > > I believe the bpd of the line area will correspond to the 14pt font > because [4.5] talks about "all the inline-areas". > > So the bpd on inlines does not bubble up the outer inlines, but it > (and/or depth & altitude) do bubble up to the calculation of > line-rectangles on the line-area. > > Also, I think that makes sense. OK, happy to proceed on that basis. For what its worth I did a quick test against xep and it seems to behave as you suggested Finn. > > > The nominal-requested-line-rectangle corresponds to a 12pt font. > > But is the area generated from the nested inline an "inline-area > > stacked within the line-area" or not? > > Stacked inline-areas must refer to all the desendents, not just the > immediate children, see [4.6.1]. > > regards, > finn BTW, thanks for your patience in this exchange Finn. Certainly clarified things for me. Manuel
