Can one of the Knuth specialist please review my element list in the new
test case below? Thanks.
BTW, if you run this test, the output looks good, but add two or three
additional lines and you'll see the problem in the output, too.
On 14.09.2005 17:02:28 jeremias wrote:
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Wed Sep 14 08:02:24 2005
> New Revision: 280872
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280872&view=rev
> Ouch. The penalties are completely wrong if a higher-level block defines
> non-conditional padding.
> (with props)