AFAICS, no, it doesn't do that, yet.

On 16.09.2005 09:39:55 Manuel Mall wrote:
> Vincent,
> 
> does FOray font expose this type of information Jeremias described 
> below?
> 
> Manuel
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:36 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > It's probably easiest for now to do as Batik does. However, Type 1
> > fonts provide information about sub and super scripts (size and
> > placement) in the PFM file. That data is currently not parsed. I
> > assume there's something similar in TrueType. So ideally, the font
> > would supply the information how exactly to handle super/sub script.
> > But keeping it simple for now will certainly not hurt.
> >
> > On 16.09.2005 09:08:24 Manuel Mall wrote:
> > > What is the correct amount of baseline shift to apply for sub and
> > > super scripts? Batik seems to use +/- 0.5 * ascender height. Is
> > > that the common way of doing it? The spec says only: "The offset
> > > ... is determined using the font data for the nominal font".
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Manuel
> >
> > Jeremias Maerki



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to