Hi Jeremias, We don't have in mind to change or modify any code in layout engine or code of formatting objects itself. It's just suggested to have our own handler which extends AreaTreeHandler. This handler should do some refinement for txt (modifying tree of formatting objects, for example changing font-size, etc). We emphasize that TxtHandler, which extends AreaTreeHandler, is used only in txt case. The method createFOEventHandler() return different FOEventHandler and in case of txt output it should return TxtHandler.
Good luck. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:11 PM > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Cc: 'Danila Ermakov' > Subject: Re: txt-rendering > > Hi Sergey, > > would you please elaborate the modifications you suggest? I'd be very > unhappy if we had to do changes in the layout engine just to accomodate > the text renderer. I think I don't quite understand what you have in > mind. > > Furthermore, I'm not sure if using different font-sizes in the case of > the text renderer is a good idea. See also: > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/output.html#txt > > On 22.09.2005 10:21:32 Sergey Simonchik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've got into TxtRenderer that was in 0.20.5. It works fine for most of > > examples but in some cases there are problems. For instance: > > > > ... > > <fo:block text-align="right" font-size="10pt">Hi</fo:block> > > <fo:block text-align="right" font-size="50pt">Helloworld</fo:block> > > ... > > > > Align doesn't correct. > > > > It's seems that modifying formatting objects before constructing area > tree > > model may help to cope with such problems. > > > > > ------Original Message----- > > > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:29 PM > > > To: email@example.com > > > Cc: Danila Ermakov > > > Subject: Re: txt-rendering > > > > > > Hi Sergey, > > > unfortunately, you didn't notice the TXTRenderer that was in 0.20.5 > . > > > The text renderer seems to work fine for many people who work with FOP > > > 0.20.5. IMO it should be simple to port that renderer to FOP Trunk. > The > > > TXTRenderer currently found in FOP Trunk is only an empty shell which > > > needs to be filled. I'd investigate that before doing any serious > coding > > > on a completely new TextRenderer. Please have a look at TXTRenderer > and > > > get back to us so we can sort out any details. The old TXTRenderer is > > > capable of creating good output without any special handling in the > area > > > tree. You will also find discussion snippets around the TXTRenderer in > > > the mailing list archives which should give you an idea about its > design. > > > BTW, I'm glad that you're going to reintroduce the TextRenderer. > > > AFAIK, there's still a open issue with a patch  where I asked you > to > > > send in an ICLA so I can commit the patch. So far, I haven't seen an > > > ICLA being recorded with your name. > > >  > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_20_2-> > > maintain/src/org/apache/fop/render/txt/ > > >  http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36480 > > > > Jeremias Maerki