Did you meet any difficulties?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:33 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Cc: Danila Ermakov
Subject: Re: rtf-external-graphics

> I'll look into it tomorrow. Peter's last change for external-graphics in 
> RTF made me wonder if we shouldn't actually change the whole code there 
> and use the image library wrappers the normal renderers use. Like this 
> we could use the image cache, more image formats and URI resolution the 
> same way as for the other output formats. 
> On 28.09.2005 17:10:23 Sergey Simonchik wrote: 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > After patch of Peter Herweg, adding support of external-graphics in Rtf 
> > (25.09.2005, revision 291449) some problems are still unresolved. 
> > I'm talking about using url's in src attribute of fo:external-graphic
tag. 
> > 
> > Take a look at fo-file below: 
> >   ... 
> >   <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body"> 
> >     <fo:block start-indent="12pt" space-before="3pt"> 
> >       <fo:external-graphic src="url('01.jpg')"/> 
> >     </fo:block> 
> >   </fo:flow> 
> >   ... 
> > 
> > Rtf renderer produced file "01a.rtf" (see in attach). 
> > 
> > After changing in file RTFHandler.java string 
> >       newGraphic.setURL(eg.getSrc()); 
> > to string 
> >       newGraphic.setURL(eg.getURL()); 
> > Rtf renderer produced another file "01b.rtf" (in attach too). 
> > 
> > File "01b.rtf" seems to be correct whether "01a.rtf" is not. 
> > 
> > What do you think about it? 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for attention! 
>
> Jeremias Maerki 

Reply via email to