+1 for a) On 21.10.2005 02:28:42 Manuel Mall wrote: > > See the response at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2005OctDec/0006.html. > > We have taken the opposite approach and added the property values to the > property defintions. > > We could now: > > a) just remove them > or > b) leave the values in and issue a warning when used > > Given that FOP 0.20.5 doesn't support this at all and it is therefore > unlikely we would be breaking anything for users moving from FOP 0.20.5 to > FOP trunk if we go for option a) I would recommend to apply the KISS > principle in this case and just remove them. > > Manuel
Jeremias Maerki
