I know it's not strictly necessary. It's just there for regression testing purposes and as a demonstration that you don't have to use the fo: prefix. It doesn't hurt, does it?
On 09.11.2005 21:38:32 Simon Pepping wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: jeremias > > Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005 > > New Revision: 332007 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev > > Log: > > Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used. > > Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then > hide it from FOP? Jeremias Maerki
