DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-14 17:07 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
<snip/>
> > Is there anything outstanding concerning this bug or can we close it? 
> 
>    As I see it there are two outstanding issues:
>       1) 'Complex' patterns on Text - While it is probably a 5% case it's 
>          bad that things won't work.
>       2) The overflow for pattern case being commented out.
> 
>    I would lean towards saying this is still broken enough to leave the
> bug open, but it's not my bug DB (so to speak).  Having it open makes
> it at least possible that someone will have an answer to their question.

Ok.

<snip/>
> > I assume you'll also help track the currently commented part that 
> > we'll have to uncomment as soon as we can rely on a later Batik version.
> 
>    I'll try and make sure of it.  What do you think of a Batik 1.6.1
> release?  There are a number of small but significant improvements
> in Batik since 1.6.1.  The real hurdle would be straightening out
> the XML lib lincensing (which really needs to be fixed anyways).

It's on my list to help you with the XML libs as soon as the FOP release is off
my desk. Anyway, I think a Batik 1.6.1 is a good idea. A lot of things have been
done since the last release.



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to