DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-18 19:30 ------- in /src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/expr/FromTableColumnFunction.java all the "public Property eval" does is to decide between two PropertyExeceptions. case 1) the construct: <fo:table ... <fo:cell> <fo:block text-align="from-table-colum(text-align)"> ... </fo:table> results in: "from-table-column unimplemented!" case 2) but the following more common construct (valid according to http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice5.html#section-N7097-Function-Calls) <fo:table ... <fo:cell> <fo:block text-align="from-table-colum()"> ... </fo:table> results in: "Incorrect parameter to from-table-column function" that may be correct for the internal work of fop, but looks (at least for me) like there was something wrong with the statment in my fo-file. because the "fo:from-table-column()" is not implemented at all (as far as i can see the FromTableColumnFunction.java does not more than decide between this two messages) i think it would be clearer for the end-user to see only the first message in all cases (for now). The second message leads to the thinking that there is an error in the fo-file ("fo:from-table-column()") and what was missleading for me. you see: complaining about obscurity i am not precise myself ;-) gerhard -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.