On 21.11.2005 10:48:24 Christian Geisert wrote: > Jeremias Maerki schrieb: > > On 20.11.2005 11:21:55 Christian Geisert wrote: > > [..] > > > Yes. I think they are necessary. To reduce the size of the 1.4 binary > > distribution we could think about removing the XML-related JARs. But IMO > > they don't hurt. > > > > What I don't get is the reason why you removed the javadocs from the > > binary distribution. Users who download the binaries have no way to > > build them themselves. > > They take up about ~2MB space and the old release didn't contain them > too. IMHO those interrested can download the source and build them (we > tell them how to dev/api-doc.html). > But I'm ok with including them too.
I personally expect the javadocs to be present in a binary release. The alternative is to publish a separate zip (fop-0.90alpha1-docs.zip) with the docs/ and /javadocs directory and remove them from the binary distribution. > Uh, the link to online javadocs (build by Gump) doesn't work, I think we > should provide them online in any case. Yes, that's probably broken ever since Gump got their Solaris zone and they moved to http://vmgump.apache.org. The problem is that they don't seem to create the federated javadocs anymore. Or I just don't find them. I'll see to it that we have them on our site. Jeremias Maerki
