OK, except that I could not verify your signature: >gpg --verify fop-0.90alpha1-src.tar.gz.asc fop-0.90alpha1-src.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon 21 Nov 2005 23:05:36 CET using DSA key ID 8408F755 gpg: BAD signature from "Christian Geisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>gpg --verify fop-0.90alpha1-bin-jdk1.4.tar.gz.asc >fop-0.90alpha1-bin-jdk1.4.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Mon 21 Nov 2005 23:05:12 CET using DSA key ID 8408F755 gpg: BAD signature from "Christian Geisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" Simon On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:36:13PM +0100, Christian Geisert wrote: > Hi, > > as you've probably noticed I've tagged the 0.90alpha1 release. > It would be nice if someone else could have a look at the builds > (available at http://people.apache.org/~chrisg/fop-0.90alpha1-test/) > for a quick test. > > If no showstoppers are reported within the next hours I'll move this to > the distribution area (and wait 24 hours for the mirrors to catch up). > > Christian > -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
