Bug 37828 showed me some deficiencies in the current column balancing
approach. It definitely needs some work. So far, I tried to solve it by
supplying a special computeDemerits() method. But currently it only
looks at the KnuthNode being passed in. That's probably not good enough.

Does anybody have any good ideas on how to do this with a better
approach?

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to