+1 from me. 0.91beta, in the end approaching 1.00, or 0.9beta1, in the end approaching 0.9very-much-production = 1.00.
Simon On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:33:47PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Feedback so far has shown that we're in a better condition than I > thought. FOP 0.90alpha1 seems to be quite usable. It even stands up to > many non-trivial documents. I've been able to fix quite a number of bugs > so far and I think I speak not only for myself when I say that it would > be good to get rid of the "alpha" tag. FOP 0.90 is certainly not a > replacement for 0.20.5 in every situation but already in many. We > already have pretty good documentation although there are, of course, > still some gaps that could be filled. Given the number of bugs fixed and > the feedback we got, I think it should be safe to do another release > tagged "beta". I don't care too much about the exact version number. > I'll leave suggestions up to you. Release early, release often.... > > WDYT? > > Jeremias Maerki > -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
