DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-12-20 19:31 -------
Confirmed. The "uri" string in PDFUri doesn't get encrypted. But wrapping "uri"
in a call to encodeText() won't be enough in this case because PDFUri is used as
a direct object. And for PDF encryption an object and generation number are
needed and these are only available on indirect objects. So, PDFUri would have
to get the parent's info but PDFObject does not currently provide access to the
parent object. Note that there are other potential candidates for the same kind
of processing (PDFGoToRemote, for example). Just an analysis from me this time. 
:-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to