DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-16 14:36 ------- The comitted patch causes footnotes in lists and tables to survive (longer?) than without. It is not finished, but I am at the limit of my knowledge and tomorrow my usual business starts, so I want to contribute what I have now - hoping it is a bit usefull for others who continue or better rewrite. Description: A) Propagate footnotes in ListItemLayoutManger when combined knuth elements are created. B) Propagate footnotes in TableStepper when combined knuth elements are created. C) Propagate footnotes in TableContentLayoutManger when boxes for table-header and table-footer are created. The shortcomings: 1) Footnotes in list-item-label produce a "Cannot find LM to handle given FO for LengthBase." AFAICS in the getBaseLength method of AbstractBaseLayoutManger. 2) Footnotes from list-item-body starts at the same position (from the starting edge) than the list-item-body itself and not at the starting edge of the region-body. 3) Footnotes on table-header and table-footer are not printed on every page where the content of the table-header and table-footer is printed but only on that page that holds the end of the table. 4) Footnotes on table-header and table-footer are ordered after the footnotes of table-body. 5) There is one situation with my example fo-file for tables that produce an endless loop (see comments there). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.