On Jan 27, 2006, at 18:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Peter and others,
I really don't mean to be a pest, but this somehow doesn't feel
right. I just wonder if any of you share the same concern, or can
offer me some solid justification...
Although I do see the necessity of it to make percentage values work
right, it seems a bit hybrid (if you catch the drift) to bypass the
whole layoutengine for RTF output on the one hand, and on the other
hand import classes from the layoutmgr package into the RTFHandler.
Right now, it works, and it enhances our RTF output, so there's no
need to revert, but I'm wondering if there isn't an alternative
solution that would look/feel better.
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Andreas
Author: pherweg
Date: Fri Jan 27 09:10:31 2006
New Revision: 372916
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372916&view=rev
Log:
RTF: testcase 'tableunits.fo' failed because there was no
PercentBaseContext passed.
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/
RTFHandler.java
Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/
RTFHandler.java
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/
org/apache/fop/render/rtf/RTFHandler.java?
rev=372916&r1=372915&r2=372916&view=diff
======================================================================
========
--- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/
RTFHandler.java (original)
+++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/
RTFHandler.java Fri Jan 27 09:10:31 2006
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@
import org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.StaticContent;
import org.apache.fop.fo.Constants;
import org.apache.fop.fo.FOText;
+import org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.table.TableContentLayoutManager;
+import org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.table.TableLayoutManager;
