DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38433>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38433 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-09 08:24 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > As I understand 0.20.5 is stable production version, and I need fop for > production version of software, so my question is: "Is it risky to put 0.91 in > production", and when can we expected that 0.91 will start to be stable > (production) version of FOP (april, may, jun)? >From my point of view, it's ok to use FOP 0.91beta in production if everything is very carefully tested. It's still a beta because this release may not yet work for every kind of document. See also: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html#FOP+0.91+beta It's expected that the next release will still be a beta-level release as there are important areas that are currently worked on. It's difficult to predict a release date for a full release. It depends a lot on the amount of time the core developers can allocate, what they allocate their time on and how much help we get from the community. But it's probably reasonable to expect a production grade pre-1.0 release around May/June. No guarantees though. An open source project lives on the attention it gets by its community. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.