DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38618>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-11 21:34 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Dear FOP developers, > > I am really happy with the new FOP. It finally renders my documents the way I > like it. I'm happy to hear that. > I would love to see the red spots on the compliance chart disappear, and I > decided to help out. That's the spirit!!! Are there more guys like you where you come from? :-) > This patch > - removes functionality that was duplicated (in RGBColorFunction and > ColorTypeProperty) > > - Adds better error handling to ColorTypeProperty > > - Adds support for the system-color() function > > I hope I follwed all the necessary steps. Good stuff. I modified your patch just a little to fix some Checkstyle issues and to handle the "FIXME" you had in the patch. I also added your FO file as a test case to the repo. New files normally require that you have an CLA [1] on file with the ASF, but since the addition was such a trivial class I consider it subject to chapter 5 in the ALv2 like the rest of the patch. I hope that was only the first of your patches. If you start doing bigger changes I would like you to submit an CLA [1] to the ASF. If you have any questions about that, please ask. [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas So, patch applied. Thanks a lot! http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377045&view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
