The latest revision of FOP Trunk right before my next commit which will add Commons is "390222" (or date: everything before today).
On 04.04.2006 16:51:59 Peter West wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 04.04.2006 15:50:09 Peter West wrote: > >> I noticed some recent commits that mentioned an xmlgraphics commons module. > >> > >> What's the state of play with this? > > > > Finally picking up speed. I got serious about migrating components from > > Batik and FOP over to the new subproject. It is "work in progress" but > > from now on always in a usable state. The build is working and I've just > > set up a Gump descriptor for Commons. > > > > The plan is still the same as before: > > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/XmlGraphicsCommonComponents > > > >> My basic question is, what fop and batik trunk versions give a stable > >> and compatible build base? > > > > All FOP, Batik and Commons Trunks are pretty stable right now. > > > >> Is there a new subversion module? > > > > Yes: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/commons/trunk > > > >> If so, will I need to add the commons module to satisfy my main > >> requirement, > > > > The Commons module is not yet a prerequisite to build FOP but will be in > > a few minutes. But there will be a xmlgraphics-commons.jar in FOP's lib > > directory. OTOH, you will want to look at the sources of Commons because > > that's where the stuff interesting for your Folio will eventually end up. > > > >> or can it be done from before the split? > > > > SVN can give you any revision/state from the past. > > Jeremias, > > What's a date or numbers from before the split that has equivalent > functionality? I'm updating against an existing FOP/Batik installation > and I want to minimise the initial disturbance, but I may just go with > the new scheme. > > Peter Jeremias Maerki