Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm sure everyone has seen this thread on fop-users. Any particular preferences on one of the two options I listed below? The first will require coordination with Batik as they are supposed to migrate to that class and it's basically their version. We used a modified version of theirs. The second is probably cleaner but since the change is backwards-incompatible for any ElementMapping implementation (Barcode4J, for example), this is not to be taken lightly. I think the first is easier, should not have any side-effects but feels more like patchwork.
I prefer the first approach. I don't like the idea of backwards incompatible changes for Extension classes.
Chris
