On Jun 5, 2006, at 12:36, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
BTW: I hope the checks are right now. Seemed a bit silly at first to
simply reproduce the calculation that is made by the method...
could've put an absolute value there, but the end-result is the same,
I guess.
I thought about that. First reaction to reusing the constant from
UnitConv was: Uhm, hmm, shrug. :-)
But I think it would probably conceptually better to replicate the
value
instead of using the constants. If someone changes the constant, we
won't find out (other than by looking at the SVN log).
Say no more! (read: d-o-n-e :))
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411742&view=rev
Later,
Andreas
