I don't see a problem doing that. It's good to get rid of obsolete code.
Only gets in newbies' way.

On 14.07.2006 19:32:40 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> Hi all,
> While browsing a bit through the FOTree code, it appeared to me that  
> the sole function of the class fo.PropertySets is in the  
> canHaveMarkers() method. None of the other members are referenced  
> anywhere in the code, so I was thinking maybe this class could be  
> removed completely?
> I'd go about that by moving that method to FONode, have it return  
> 'false', and override to return true on the FONode subclasses in  
> question, unless anyone objects...

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to