I don't see a problem doing that. It's good to get rid of obsolete code. Only gets in newbies' way.
On 14.07.2006 19:32:40 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > Hi all, > > While browsing a bit through the FOTree code, it appeared to me that > the sole function of the class fo.PropertySets is in the > canHaveMarkers() method. None of the other members are referenced > anywhere in the code, so I was thinking maybe this class could be > removed completely? > > I'd go about that by moving that method to FONode, have it return > 'false', and override to return true on the FONode subclasses in > question, unless anyone objects... Jeremias Maerki