DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40271>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40271 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-21 02:45 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Looking a bit closer, IMO the minimum column-width should be derived from the layout context. Count > the number of non-null elements in the Table's column-list (one time process), then divide the refIPD of > the layout-context by the number of explicitly defined columns (alt.: the largest number of cells in a row > --that is a value that could be determined in the FOTree, before layout > begins) I'm not sure I follow you. I thought the minimum column-width was to be determined by the "largest minimum cell width (or the column 'width', whichever is larger)". (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.html#width-layout) Do you mean that we would consider the "default" column-width to be the one calculated as you describe ? Patrick -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
