DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40519>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40519





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-09-19 11:45 -------
(In reply to comment #9)

  Today I've been trying the patch with CCITT T.4, CCITT T.6 and PackBits. All
has worked fine. I ran everything in a Windows XP PC with jdk 1.5.0_03 and jai
tools installed on the jdk.

  There's a little quality difference between CCITT T.4 and PackBits that I
think it's due to the inherent compression of each type, or maybe some
antialiasing on PackBits. Anyway the difference of quality is widely compensed
by the difference of weight 2592kB on PackBits vs 240kB on CCITT T.4 for the
same rendered MTIFF.
  Apparently there's no significant difference between CCITT T.4 and CCITT T.6.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to