DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-31 08:38 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> If I run the FO file through fop (trunk and 0.92) I get an exception related 
> to
> page sequences and regions.

Confirmed. Why would anyone file a bug against v0.92 when obviously not using 
that version at all?

Would like to repeat the following question to the OP: 
Are you *absolutely certain* that FOP is even used to produce the erroneous 
PDF? Judging from the 
metadata, the document was at least post-processed by Adobe Distiller.

If you can't provide the right info, we can't help you. Sorry, but that's just 
the way it works...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to