DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-31 08:38 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > If I run the FO file through fop (trunk and 0.92) I get an exception related > to > page sequences and regions. Confirmed. Why would anyone file a bug against v0.92 when obviously not using that version at all? Would like to repeat the following question to the OP: Are you *absolutely certain* that FOP is even used to produce the erroneous PDF? Judging from the metadata, the document was at least post-processed by Adobe Distiller. If you can't provide the right info, we can't help you. Sorry, but that's just the way it works... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.