DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-11-28 15:33 -------
Further points
- Using a ternary tree for the charclass arrays seems to be wasteful. Two
  parallel arrays and a Array binary search should be sufficient.
- The charclass parser wont check whether a . (dot) represents a class. The
  dot is reserved as begin/end of word marker in patterns, using it als
  class representation will probably cause problems.
- The pattern parser wont check whether the non-digits in the patterns are
  actually charclass representations.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to