DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144

           Summary: [PATCH] Safely set postscript page device dictionary,
                    additional processing states for OffDocumentItems
           Product: Fop
           Version: all
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-
                    fop/ExtensionsForPostScript
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ps
        AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


See http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ExtensionsForPostScript for details
of the new extensions I have added.

This patch should also includes :-

* Some performance improvements in page rendition so postscript page setup is
cached and reused for pages that use the same simple-page-master.
* Changes to org.apache.fop.area.OffDocumentItem, 
org.apache.fop.area.RenderPagesModel with the addition of some new off document
item "when to process" states: BEFORE_PAGE, BEFORE_PAGE_SEQ, AFTER_PAGE_SEQ for
org.apache.fop.area.OffDocumentItem.
* Changes to org.apache.fop.area.AreaTreeHander so extension attachments
declared as children of simple page master are handled BEFORE_PAGE_SEQ on 
renderer.
* Changes to org.apache.fop.area.OffDocumentExtension so whenToProcess can be 
set.
* A new protected accessor method called getPSGenerator on
org.apache.fop.ps.PSRenderer that should make it a little easier to customize
resolving.
* Added extension attachments to base org.apache.fop.area.AreaTreeObject class

Please try the patch out, as always feedback is welcome :-).

Adrian Cumiskey.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to