DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-30 06:41 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I get the impression that it should be possible to do this without breaking
> backwards-compatibility too much. Maybe we should do an inventory of people
> who are maintaining external renderers so we have an idea who would be
> affected and how much.
Yes, if nobody picks up this trait, then we don't have to worry about it either.
Within FOP, only PDFRenderer uses it. Notice that my patch does break custom
renderers at this point, but they can be fixed with a one-line code change. The
only way not to break them at all would be to pass PV key and ID in separate
>> It could possibly also remove the necessity to extend the area tree XML
>> format with the "idfirsts" trait. Just a thought.
> I'm in no position to "want" anything. :-) I can only make wishes and be happy
> that there are people around helping us out. But consider the removal of the
> idfirsts attribute a wish. *g*
Well, I think I can do it this week. The more I look at that attribute, the more
I hate it, so I guess I'm motivated :-)
> Since I'll be leaving for ApacheCon in a few hours I may not have enough time
> to finish applying the current patch.
I wish you all a great time at the conference and in Amsterdam (my hometown). At
least the weather is fine!
> BTW, another wish if I may: Would you please submit an ICLA (and CCLA if
OK, I'll take care of it.
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.