DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-16 03:55 ------- Apologies for the delay. Fixed in FOP trunk. see: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576072&view=rev Thanks for reporting the issue. For documentation purposes: The problem was that for regular (non-marker) FO nodes, addChildNode() is called BEFORE the node's children are processed and added, and this was not yet the case while cloning the marker. This led to the XMLWhiteSpaceHandler being incorrectly initialized, which caused the erroneous white-space removal. This has now been corrected: when cloning the marker-descendants, addChildNode() is now also called before cloning the rest of the subtree. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
