Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU > cycles than setting a boolean to true, right?
That’s not a problem of performance. When I see this I simply wonder why a long is used while a boolean would be sufficient. Statistical interest, why not, although here it only exists when doing a manual debugging session. That’s not a very big deal anyway since here the class is small, but when you encounter such variables in hundreds of other lines of codes, believe me, it takes a while before figuring out that they are actually used as booleans... A small comment, perhaps? Vincent
