DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44393>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44393 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-12 00:30 ------- This is not a question if these values are "authorized". Of course, EN_ALL and EN_NONE are illegal on the break-before/after properties but if we choose to use them internally, it's our choice. The comments where these are used should make clear why they are there. Span changes are break conditions for FOP and need to be handled accordingly. Your change caused something else which doesn't have anything to do with EN_ALL/EN_NONE. You switched from a (perhaps somewhat suboptimal) -1 value to generating EN_AUTO for normal breaks in table layout which caused the PageBreaker to react wrongly. I've added the necessary check to handle the new case, too. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=620723&view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.