https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45027
Antonio Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #10 from Antonio Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-02 09:25:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks for the test files. I can now reproduce the effect. This is really > strange. What I can tell you is that the text painting code in PDF doesn't > change if I remove the opacity from the rectangle being painted AFTER the > text. > But what's important to note is that I've seen the effect only on Acrobat 8 > but > not on Acrobat 5 or GhostScript/GhostView. At the moment I have absolutely no > clue why this happens. I'm attaching the two PDF files (with compression > turned > off) to demonstrate the difference. Maybe someone could check if the effect > occurs on other Acrobat versions like 6 or 7 and report back here. > > As a side-note: It's a bit strange that Batik paints the transparent rectangle > as a bitmap as this is such a simple element. That could probably be improved > somehow. That accounts for the increase in size when opacity is turned used, > but it doesn't explain why the text color changes to a darker blue. There's > also an inconsistency about how the coordinate system for the rectangle is set > up between the two variants. But again, this doesn't account for the color > change. > Actually I realized this problem when I printed a document using Acrobat 5, (the blue was not printed correct). As you said, in the screen of Acrobat 5 the blue renders accurate but it doesn't in the printer. Acrobat 8 is in this sense ‘more WYSIWYG’. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.