>----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >Van: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 08:40 PM > >You’re both right of course. I didn’t have that possibility in mind when >writing my post to fop-dev. No warning needed indeed :-) <snip /> [Me: ] >>> * if it is not a table-cell or table-column, return a zero value to >>> avoid the property subsystem calling make(PropertyList) to construct a >>> default/initial value > >That’s not so simple IMO. column-number must be assigned its specified >value even when the object isn’t a table-cell nor a table-column.
Right! I was contradicting myself here. First say that the property may be specified and significant (even if non-applicable), and then silently revert to a zero value... This is of course out of the question. :-) Thanks for the feedback! Cheers Andreas