Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-06-29 
04:10:42 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)

> The issue is partly fixed in FOP Trunk. page-number-citations in markers no
> longer throw an Exception, but there is still a remaining problem for the
> forward reference: in the example '', the retrieved marker shows 'page 
> 2
> of 1'.

Looking closer, the output does seem to be correct. The fo:marker in
fo:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'end-seq1'] still belongs to page 1. The second page is an 
page that is produced by the fact that the second page-sequence has an odd
initial-page-number. Setting force-page-count to 'no-force' on the first,
generates only one page.

So, the bug concerning forward-references is fixed in FOP Trunk now.
I have also added a disabled tescase for the remaining problem with


Thanks for reporting!

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to