On Jun 19, 2008, at 20:05, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 18:34, Jean-François El Fouly wrote:
Jean-François (and other interested parties),
Just as a heads-up:
Before going any further, will 1.1 features be considered by the
for inclusion in FOP trunk if ever we succeed in implementing them ?
Definitely! In current FOP trunk, fo:retrieve-table-marker has been
prepared to some extent (the FO-tree side is roughly OK)
For the remainder, I can think of a few other features I was
recently thinking of myself:
- fo:folio-prefix / fo:folio-suffix (this I think to be the most
straightforward to implement)
During the weekend, I already committed a change to Constants.java as
a very small first step.
In the meantime, I'm close to getting fo:folio-prefix and fo:folio-
suffix to work.
The rest remains open for now. Just thought I'd let this know, so we
don't work on the same things.