https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
--- Comment #7 from Andreas L. Delmelle <adelme...@apache.org> 2009-03-09 11:06:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Testing some combinations, I've just noticed a small error in FOP Trunk: > reference-orientation is treated as an inherited property, while it most > certainly is not. Since a lot of tests seem to be depending on it, it may take > a while to fix this, although, purely codewise, it's only a matter of changing > a boolean switch in FOPropertyMapping... :-/ I'm currently looking closer into this one, and it seems the related checks in the tests are entirely correct (mainly simple-page-master_reference-orientation_*). Only, somehow the erroneous inheritance of the property has been taken into account when creating the region-viewport/region-reference area pair. Currently, in Page.makeRegionViewport(), an absolute rectangle is created (in page-coordinates) for the viewport-area. When setting the region-reference-area position, however, the 'width/ipd' that is obtained from this absolute rectangle should actually be the 'height/bpd' of the region-reference-area. What happens is that the absolute rectangle takes into account the reference-orientation specified on the simple-page-master. When creating the reference-area, though, we use the same pageCTM, but with the region's reference-orientation (which is 0, meaning no rotation with respect to the viewport). -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
