https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826
--- Comment #5 from Andreas L. Delmelle <adelme...@apache.org> 2009-03-10 10:43:40 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Andreas - I have a question about your proposed change. Its really only for my > understanding: Suppose you have something like: > <snip /> > The current behaviour of this is that both Text1 and Text2 will be rotated. > After your change can we expect Text1 and Text2 to have a different > orientation? I think not, and IIC, this should not be the case. Nevertheless, I recently bumped into precisely that effect when nesting block-containers: the inner block-container would inherit the value of the outer block-container, and thus be rotated another 90 degrees relative to the outer b-c reference-area. In the case you present, the region-body is rotated by 90 degrees. So, the flow-reference-area will be rotated by 90 degrees with respect to the page-reference-area. The block-container, having reference-orientation 0 relative to the flow-reference-area, will also be rotated by 90 degrees relative to the page. Result: with normal A4 dimensions (210x297), we will get a portrait page, with both Text1 and Text2 appearing below each other in the page's lower-left corner, rotated by the same amount wrt the page. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
