Peter, the "why" questions are often difficult. ;-) I don't see a problem with extending the Build-Id property, for example with the attached patch. If noone objects, I'm happy to commit that.
On 08.02.2010 11:04:47 Peter Hancock wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know the why the Build-Id property of the MANIFEST.MF file > should include the ant property 'java.runtime.version', yet not the > 'javac.target' property used by the javac task in the compile target? I > appreciate that the version of the JVM running ant may perhaps affect the > build process, but is it not more useful to have info on the JVM that the > fop.jar is compiled for? > > Thanks for any comments in advance, > > Peter Jeremias Maerki
build-id-patch.diff
Description: Binary data
