Hi Simon,

Le 07/07/2010 17:13, Simon Pepping a écrit :
> This completes the documentation for the release. Note the following
> points:
> Rewrote xdocs/status.xml. Removed all references to the 0.20
> versions. Removed all links to 0.94 and earlier.
> xdocs/upgrading.xml is completely outdated. Do we need a new upgrading
> document, or shall we delete it?
Whatever the FOP tab, the page is quite the same (except current
version) and is mainly about Fop 0.2x to Fop 0.9x upgrade.
Rather than a specific version information, this should be (IMHO) a
general information, threated as a FAQ entry.
Note that there are still questions about this topic on FOP-user list.

> faq id="svg-attribute-required": still applicable?
> examples.xml: 'Developers will find the first steps to a test suite
> for all implemented formatting objects and properties in
> xml-fop/test/xml/'. Is this still the best advertisement for our test
> suite?
> resources.xml: Latest supported SVG specification?
> resources.xml, PDF: All three Adobe links are outdated. PS: Both links
> are outdated.
> resources.xml, TIFFRenderer: link outdated. 
> resources.xml, AFP renderer: Does it still make sense to link to this
> page, since we now have the AFP renderer included?
> 1.0/pdfx.html, note: Support for PDF/X is no longer new. Reformulate.
> Please, consider if you want to make some changes or have some
> comments.
> Simon
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:04:02PM -0000, spepp...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: spepping
>> Date: Wed Jul  7 15:04:01 2010
>> New Revision: 961399
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961399&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Changes to the documentation, partly needed for the new release,
>> partly updates to outdated information

Reply via email to