Hi Simon, Le 07/07/2010 17:13, Simon Pepping a écrit : > This completes the documentation for the release. Note the following > points: > > Rewrote xdocs/status.xml. Removed all references to the 0.20 > versions. Removed all links to 0.94 and earlier. > > xdocs/upgrading.xml is completely outdated. Do we need a new upgrading > document, or shall we delete it? > Whatever the FOP tab, the page is quite the same (except current version) and is mainly about Fop 0.2x to Fop 0.9x upgrade. Rather than a specific version information, this should be (IMHO) a general information, threated as a FAQ entry. Note that there are still questions about this topic on FOP-user list.
> faq id="svg-attribute-required": still applicable? > > examples.xml: 'Developers will find the first steps to a test suite > for all implemented formatting objects and properties in > xml-fop/test/xml/'. Is this still the best advertisement for our test > suite? > > resources.xml: Latest supported SVG specification? > > resources.xml, PDF: All three Adobe links are outdated. PS: Both links > are outdated. > > resources.xml, TIFFRenderer: link outdated. > > resources.xml, AFP renderer: Does it still make sense to link to this > page, since we now have the AFP renderer included? > > 1.0/pdfx.html, note: Support for PDF/X is no longer new. Reformulate. > > Please, consider if you want to make some changes or have some > comments. > > Simon > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:04:02PM -0000, spepp...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: spepping >> Date: Wed Jul 7 15:04:01 2010 >> New Revision: 961399 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961399&view=rev >> Log: >> Changes to the documentation, partly needed for the new release, >> partly updates to outdated information >> > -- Pascal
