On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

> that is a reasonable objection to removing the file, so indeed i would not
> object to leaving it in place; however, i did not test checkstyle 1.4, and
> indeed, there are a few changes that appear at the end of the new
> checkstyles-5.1.xml file which would need to be added to the older
> checkstyle-1.4.xml file (presuming they are supported in 1.4) in order to
> enable the currently used suppressions; on the other hand, i'm not sure we
> want to make (or continue to make) FOP compatible with specific IDEs, since
> at present, only the command line ANT build is effectively supported; but in
> the interest of compromise, i won't object to retaining the old 1.4 file
> (you may wish to update it with the new suppression clauses), namely, by
> adding:


Reply via email to