Hi, We've been bitten several times in the past already by the fact that fop.bat doesn’t automatically pick jars in the lib directory. Even users stumble upon that kind of issue.
My question is: is it safe to remove it? Would one of the other two scripts be a sane default on nowadays Windows platforms? Thanks, Vincent On 02/11/10 11:12, Simon Pepping wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:31:23PM +0100, J.Pietschmann wrote: >> On 01.11.2010 13:20, Peter Hancock wrote: >>> I am not a windows user and so there may be an environmental reason >>> you are not have success but I do not think that is likely. >> >> The fop.bat for windows isn't nearly as intelligent as the fop >> shell script used on Linux/Unix. In particular, on windows each >> jar which has to be included into the classpath gets an explicit >> line in the fop.bat, while the shell script automatically includes >> every jar it finds in the lib subdirectory. The fop.cmd command >> file should also automatically includes every jar in the lib subdir, >> but usually the fop.bat command takes precedence. > > I created fop.js for the same purpose. It should also include all jar > files in the lib subdirectory automatically. Since I do not use MS > Windows myself, I did not use or test it recently. > > Simon > >> So in order to so in order to get FOP with JEuclid working on Windows >> with the fop.bat command, the fop.bat file has to be modified to >> add the JEuclid jars to LOCALCLASSPATH (this should'nt be too hard). >> Or just call fop.cmd explicitely: >> fop.cmd mathml.fo mathml.pdf > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
