https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49835
--- Comment #15 from [email protected] 2011-02-21 04:19:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > The minimal test case must be wrong. The output is the same with or > > > without the > > > patch and it behaves normally, ie rows are displayed were they should. > > > > Which test case are you referring to exactly? I checked all attachments > > before > > and after the patch. > > It just occurred to me that, if you mean the 'slightly altered' test case, you > may want to read comment 5 more closely. It is expected to produce the same > result before and after. More a reference sample to be able to see the > difference during debugging. I am sorry Andreas, I am not an expert in fop internals, so my response might have been too fast (and wrong) and it created some confusion. I was under the impression, that the minimal test case (by Jeremias) manifested the same behavior as Adam's original sample. The result I got from minimal, with and without, the patch is identical. So, I guess this test case does not expose the problem. I haven't tested with your revised (Slightly Altered) test, and I was not referring to it.. As for the other bug, it is my mistake, I was referring to bug https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801, which is still open and is a totally different case. I am sorry again for the misunderstanding. Regards, Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
