By ancestor I refer to the relationship with respect to the fo: element hierarchy: Since the definition of fo:basic-link does not depend upon fo:inline, we cannot conclude that fo:basic-link is an fo:inline.
The parameter entity "%inline;" refers to inline-level fo elements, fo:inline and fo:basic-link being members, and this is now reflected on the FOP FO object hierarchy, where Inline and BasicLink extend InlineLevel Have I understood the recommendation correctly, or have I missed anything? On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: > i'm not sure what you mean by 'ancestor', since containment relation is not > at issue here; > your argument is counter to the definition of the parameter entity %inline; > defined in XSL 1.1 Section 6.2 > > The parameter entity, "%inline;" in the content models below, contains the > following formatting objects: > > bidi-override > character > external-graphic > instream-foreign-object > inline > inline-container > leader > page-number > page-number-citation > page-number-citation-last > scaling-value-citation > basic-link > multi-toggle > index-page-citation-list > > i believe you should first restore the previous state of affairs, and then, > if you wish to continue making the case that it is not inline, take it up > with the group and get consensus before making what appears to be a possibly > unjustified architectural change > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Peter Hancock <peter.hanc...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> While fo:basic-link and fo:inline are both inline level elements, one >> is not the ancestor of the other and so FOP's model of the FO elements >> should reflect this, I believe. >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: >> > if I recall, I need this inheritance (from Inline) to work in the >> > complex >> > script branch as well >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Simon Pepping <spepp...@leverkruid.eu> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:18:54AM -0000, phanc...@apache.org wrote: >> >> > Author: phancock >> >> > Date: Thu Sep 29 10:18:53 2011 >> >> > New Revision: 1177251 >> >> > >> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1177251&view=rev >> >> > Log: >> >> > Fix FO tree hierarchy: BasicLink shouldn't inherit from Inline >> >> >> >> Why? A basic-link is an inline object which generates inline areas. >> >> >> >> Simon >> > >> > > >