Thomas Dörr <thomas.doerr <at> haufe-lexware.net> writes:
> But I'd prefer continuing to
> use FOP.

Same here, FOP served us very well in the past and there is no reason to switch…

> We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of
> course we'd pay for that implementation.

Let me second that, if someone steps up to implement that I am sure we can throw
money into the bowl too.

Reply via email to